Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Jordi Samper-Montana Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Basilashvili vs Samper-Montana analysis and find out who is favored!
Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Jordi Samper-Montana Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Basilashvili 1 - 1 Samper-Montana
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Basilashvili has won 48.41% of points on their second serve, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Basilashvili, in recent form, has won 54.2% of their opponent's second serve points, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.42% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Basilashvili has saved 61.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Samper-Montana has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Basilashvili has won 52.17% of matches played (W/L 24/ 22), with Samper-Montana winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Basilashvili has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 161/ 129), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 64/ 75). Samper-Montana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 69/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Basilashvili has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.33% of matches (W/L 13/ 17), where as Samper-Montana has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Basilashvili winning 1 times and Samper-Montana being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Basilashvili winning 2 and Samper-Montana winning 2. The last match between Basilashvili and Samper-Montana was at the Prague Challenger, 27-07-2016, First, Clay with Nikoloz Basilashvili getting the victory 7-6(3) 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:55.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Basilashvili and Samper-Montana have played a deciding set 0 times, with Basilashvili winning 0 times and Samper-Montana 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Basilashvili winning 1, and Samper-Montana 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Basilashvili has played against opponents with an average rank of 243 while Samper-Montana has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Basilashvili has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Samper-Montana has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Basilashvili has converted 40.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Samper-Montana has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
512
Rank
16
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
179
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
52% (442-405)
Career Total W/L
56% (442-346)
59% (23-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$5,610,611
Career Prize Money
$84,925
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Basilashvili VS Samper-Montana H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Jordi Samper-Montana |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 17 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:55 | 1:5:55 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (67/102) | 54% (44/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (41/67) | 61% (27/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (14/35) | 42% (16/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 29% (5/17) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (39/82) | 46% (47/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Basilashvili VS Samper-Montana H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 7-5 |
Stats 
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
5
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| 6-1 5-2 ret. | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Jordi Samper-Montana |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (23/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (52/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (425/363) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.37 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 143 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 110 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:13 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 227.28 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1469/2535) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (1056/1469) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (516/1066) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (121/297) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1092/2609) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (12/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (11/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (23/38) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (23/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (23/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Nikoloz Basilashvili Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Forejtek
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Ray Ho
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Marcelo Zormann
52%
(
17 of
33)
1st Serve %
45%
(
17 of
38)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
17 of
17)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
49
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
35%
(
22 of
63)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Giovanni Fonio
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Carlos Taberner
43%
(
27 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Marvin Moeller
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Jordi Samper-Montana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gengo Kikuchi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Len Schouten
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Palaphoom Kovapitukted
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ko Suzuki
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Shohei Chikami
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Toledo Bague
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Basilashvili Vs Samper-Montana Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
